rs760631068

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.466G>A(p.Glu156Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000818 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.168

Variant links:

Genes affected

PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

PDGFRA links:

ENSG00000282278 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000282278 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014832288).

BP6

Variant 4-54263765-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54263765-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 407397.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1, Benign=1}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 19 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PDGFRA	NM_006206.6 link	c.466G>A	p.Glu156Lys	missense_variant	4/23	ENST00000257290.10	NP_006197.1	P16234-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PDGFRA	ENST00000257290.10 link	c.466G>A	p.Glu156Lys	missense_variant	4/23	1	NM_006206.6	ENSP00000257290.5		P16234-1
ENSG00000282278	ENST00000507166.5 link	c.1018-11160G>A		intron_variant		2		ENSP00000423325.1		A0A0B4J203

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000125

AC:

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000195

AC:

AN:

251276

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000206

AC XY:

AN XY:

135788

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000521

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000784

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000528

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000773

AC:

113

AN:

1461842

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000921

AC XY:

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000582

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000754

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000125

AC:

AN:

152096

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74284

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.000204

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000355

ExAC

AF:

0.000222

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

PDGFRA-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 08, 2024

The PDGFRA c.466G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu156Lys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.078% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. This variant is interpreted as uncertain or likely benign in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/407397/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Sep 22, 2022

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 17, 2024

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 20, 2024

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.064

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.58

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.79

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.047

T;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.030

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0087

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.63

N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.019

Sift

Benign

0.79

T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.69

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B;.;.

Vest4

0.085

MutPred

0.39

Gain of methylation at E156 (P = 0.0108);Gain of methylation at E156 (P = 0.0108);Gain of methylation at E156 (P = 0.0108);Gain of methylation at E156 (P = 0.0108);

MVP

0.23

MPC

0.36

ClinPred

0.013

GERP RS

-2.2

Varity_R

0.040

gMVP

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over