rs760647541

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_004064.5(CDKN1B):​c.154A>C​(p.Met52Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000558 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDKN1B
NM_004064.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.56
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDKN1B (HGNC:1785): (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B) This gene encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, which shares a limited similarity with CDK inhibitor CDKN1A/p21. The encoded protein binds to and prevents the activation of cyclin E-CDK2 or cyclin D-CDK4 complexes, and thus controls the cell cycle progression at G1. The degradation of this protein, which is triggered by its CDK dependent phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination by SCF complexes, is required for the cellular transition from quiescence to the proliferative state. Mutations in this gene are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type IV (MEN4). [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.073347986).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000197 (3/152246) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000578 (3/5194). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000157. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDKN1BNM_004064.5 linkc.154A>C p.Met52Leu missense_variant Exon 1 of 3 ENST00000228872.9 NP_004055.1 P46527Q6I9V6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDKN1BENST00000228872.9 linkc.154A>C p.Met52Leu missense_variant Exon 1 of 3 1 NM_004064.5 ENSP00000228872.4 P46527

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000358
AC:
9
AN:
251470
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000489
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000410
AC:
6
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
51
AF XY:
0.00000275
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Feb 05, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Oct 01, 2019
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 Uncertain:1
Nov 26, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 52 of the CDKN1B protein (p.Met52Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs760647541, gnomAD 0.05%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDKN1B-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 469000). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Sep 14, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.22
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.10
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.19
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.84
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.023
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.073
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.81
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.51
N;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.28
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.30
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.32
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.028
B;.;.
Vest4
0.21
MutPred
0.55
Gain of ubiquitination at K47 (P = 0.1446);Gain of ubiquitination at K47 (P = 0.1446);.;
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.068
ClinPred
0.085
T
GERP RS
2.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.30
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs760647541; hg19: chr12-12870927; API