rs760840557
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.1545A>G(p.Arg515Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005359.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD4 | NM_005359.6 | c.1545A>G | p.Arg515Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | ENST00000342988.8 | NP_005350.1 | |
SMAD4 | NM_001407041.1 | c.1545A>G | p.Arg515Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | NP_001393970.1 | ||
SMAD4 | NM_001407042.1 | c.1545A>G | p.Arg515Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | NP_001393971.1 | ||
SMAD4 | NR_176265.1 | n.2196A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 13 of 13 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251444Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461872Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Myhre syndrome Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at