rs76109289
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001374689.1(POMT1):c.874G>A(p.Gly292Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00374 in 1,613,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 250 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/14 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374689.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POMT1 | NM_001077365.2 | c.891G>A | p.Leu297Leu | synonymous_variant | 10/20 | ENST00000402686.8 | NP_001070833.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POMT1 | ENST00000402686.8 | c.891G>A | p.Leu297Leu | synonymous_variant | 10/20 | 1 | NM_001077365.2 | ENSP00000385797.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00644 AC: 980AN: 152210Hom.: 34 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0137 AC: 3456AN: 251486Hom.: 157 AF XY: 0.0106 AC XY: 1438AN XY: 135914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00346 AC: 5054AN: 1461596Hom.: 214 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00298 AC XY: 2169AN XY: 727124
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00649 AC: 989AN: 152328Hom.: 36 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00695 AC XY: 518AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 31, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 10, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 18, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 15, 2017 | - - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2K Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Walker-Warburg congenital muscular dystrophy;C1836373:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2K;C5436962:Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with intellectual disability), type B1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at