rs76116949

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_025137.4(SPG11):​c.7256A>G​(p.Lys2419Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00222 in 1,614,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 43 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 44 hom. )

Consequence

SPG11
NM_025137.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.46

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPG11 (HGNC:11226): (SPG11 vesicle trafficking associated, spatacsin) The protein encoded by this gene is a potential transmembrane protein that is phosphorylated upon DNA damage. Defects in this gene are a cause of spastic paraplegia type 11 (SPG11). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2009]
EIF3J (HGNC:3270): (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J) This gene encodes a core subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 complex, which participates in the initiation of translation by aiding in the recruitment of protein and mRNA components to the 40S ribosome. There are pseudogenes for this gene on chromosomes 1, 3, and 9. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0036320686).
BP6
Variant 15-44563197-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-44563197-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 241599.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0117 (1782/152346) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0411 (1710/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0395. There are 43 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 828 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 43 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPG11NM_025137.4 linkc.7256A>G p.Lys2419Arg missense_variant Exon 40 of 40 ENST00000261866.12 NP_079413.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPG11ENST00000261866.12 linkc.7256A>G p.Lys2419Arg missense_variant Exon 40 of 40 1 NM_025137.4 ENSP00000261866.7 Q96JI7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0116
AC:
1768
AN:
152228
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0409
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00305
AC:
766
AN:
251404
AF XY:
0.00235
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0428
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00123
AC:
1801
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
44
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00110
AC XY:
798
AN XY:
727224
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0438
AC:
1468
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
85
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000255
AC:
22
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00416
AC:
24
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000315
AC:
35
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
167
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
89
177
266
354
443
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0117
AC:
1782
AN:
152346
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0111
AC XY:
828
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0411
AC:
1710
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00333
AC:
51
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00662
AC:
14
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
91
182
274
365
456
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00381
Hom.:
31
Bravo
AF:
0.0135
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0378
AC:
166
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00381
AC:
463
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 11 Benign:5
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 18, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 18, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
May 03, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SPG11: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Aug 01, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Uncertain:1
Sep 09, 2020
UM ALS/MND Lab, University Of Malta
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:case-control

- -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Apr 01, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.086
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.10
T;.
Eigen
Benign
0.13
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.85
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0036
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.59
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;.
PhyloP100
1.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.56
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.31
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.055
T;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;.
Vest4
0.68
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.19
ClinPred
0.0099
T
GERP RS
2.3
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.17
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76116949; hg19: chr15-44855395; API