rs761862121
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_000352.6(ABCC8):āc.2666A>Cā(p.Lys889Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ABCC8
NM_000352.6 missense
NM_000352.6 missense
Scores
8
9
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.70
Genes affected
ABCC8 (HGNC:59): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein functions as a modulator of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and insulin release. Mutations in the ABCC8 gene and deficiencies in the encoded protein have been observed in patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder of unregulated and high insulin secretion. Mutations have also been associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, an autosomal dominant disease of defective insulin secretion. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.83
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | NM_000352.6 | c.2666A>C | p.Lys889Thr | missense_variant | 22/39 | ENST00000389817.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | ENST00000389817.8 | c.2666A>C | p.Lys889Thr | missense_variant | 22/39 | 1 | NM_000352.6 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251466Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
251466
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74322
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74322
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 21, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 29, 2021 | Variant summary: ABCC8 c.2666A>C (p.Lys889Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251466 control chromosomes. c.2666A>C has been reported in the literature in a patient with diazoxide-unresponsive diffuse CHI carrying only the variant of interest (Bellanne-Chantelot_2010), as well as a patient with CHI carrying the variant in the homozygous state (Giurgea_2004). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. In vitro expression studies testing traffic efficiency and responses of mutant channels to activation by MgADP and diazoxide showed the variant to have reduced but significant activity (Saint-Martin_2015). Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. - |
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 07, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 13, 2024 | - - |
Monogenic diabetes Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Oct 26, 2018 | ACMG criteria: PP3 (REVEL 0.763 + 8 predictors; not using BP4/2 predictors), PM2 (extremely low frequency in gnomAD)= VUS (Not using PS3- PMID:24814349/Saint Martin 2015 paper, it seems the functional studies aren't completely conclusive- it shows limited effect on channel activity (50% of WT compared to other mutations that maintained less than 85% of WT activity; "The K890T channel showed ~50% and ~70% of the WT response to MgADP and diazoxide, respectively, consistent with the reduced but significant activity in Rb efflux assays." Two cases PMID: 14764815 and PMID: 24814349 but not sure if phenotype is specific so not using PP4) - |
Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;.;L;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.88
.;.;P;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.94, 0.95
MVP
0.93
MPC
0.75
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at