rs761962858
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001145252.3(CFP):c.236G>A(p.Arg79Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000553 in 1,206,119 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. There are 354 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001145252.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- properdin deficiency, X-linkedInheritance: XL Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFP | NM_001145252.3 | c.236G>A | p.Arg79Gln | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 9 | ENST00000396992.8 | NP_001138724.1 | |
| CFP | NM_002621.2 | c.236G>A | p.Arg79Gln | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 10 | NP_002612.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000206 AC: 23AN: 111812Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00114 AC: 195AN: 170702 AF XY: 0.00161 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000589 AC: 644AN: 1094255Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000955 AC XY: 344AN XY: 360023 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000206 AC: 23AN: 111864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000294 AC XY: 10AN XY: 34036 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
CFP-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at