rs762200707

Positions:

chr2-208124209-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_006891.4(CRYGD):c.155C>G(p.Ser52Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000525 in 152,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000098 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

CRYGD
NM_006891.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.60

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYGD (HGNC:2411): (crystallin gamma D) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRYGD links:

LOC100507443 (HGNC:):

LOC100507443 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM1

In a chain Gamma-crystallin D (size 172) in uniprot entity CRGD_HUMAN there are 22 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (85%) in NM_006891.4

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000525 (8/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000103 (7/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000477. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CRYGD	NM_006891.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.155C>G	p.Ser52Trp	missense_variant	2/3	ENST00000264376.5	NP_008822.2	P07320A0A140CTX7
LOC100507443	NR_038437.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.97+4984G>C		intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CRYGD	ENST00000264376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.155C>G	p.Ser52Trp	missense_variant	2/3	1	NM_006891.4	ENSP00000264376.4		P07320

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152152

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000106

AC:

AN:

246370

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000119

AC XY:

AN XY:

134302

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000672

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000146

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000110

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000108

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000332

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.0000980

AC:

143

AN:

1459244

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000951

AC XY:

AN XY:

725900

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000403

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000929

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000909

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000996

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000525

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000169

Hom.:

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000305

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 14, 2021

The c.155C>G (p.S52W) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 2) of the CRYGD gene. This alteration results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 155, causing the serine (S) at amino acid position 52 to be replaced by a tryptophan (W). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

not provided

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

- -

Aculeiform cataract

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Aug 31, 2021

This sequence change replaces serine with tryptophan at codon 52 of the CRYGD protein (p.Ser52Trp). The serine residue is weakly conserved and there is a large physicochemical difference between serine and tryptophan. This variant is present in population databases (rs762200707, ExAC 0.07%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant (PMID: 28166811). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CRYGD-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.22

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.065

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

6.0

DANN

Uncertain

0.97

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.49

Eigen

Benign

-0.61

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.93

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.035

M_CAP

Benign

0.078

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.48

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.60

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.2

REVEL

Uncertain

0.44

Sift

Uncertain

0.0090

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.018

Polyphen

0.98

Vest4

0.32

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.88

ClinPred

0.073

GERP RS

-6.9

Varity_R

0.37

gMVP

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over