rs76249490
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_020247.5(COQ8A):c.238C>T(p.His80Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00235 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. H80H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020247.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COQ8A | NM_020247.5 | c.238C>T | p.His80Tyr | missense_variant | 3/15 | ENST00000366777.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COQ8A | ENST00000366777.4 | c.238C>T | p.His80Tyr | missense_variant | 3/15 | 1 | NM_020247.5 | P1 | |
COQ8A | ENST00000366778.5 | c.82C>T | p.His28Tyr | missense_variant | 3/15 | 1 | |||
COQ8A | ENST00000489044.1 | n.449C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/5 | 3 | ||||
COQ8A | ENST00000478406.5 | n.107-12389C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00249 AC: 379AN: 152240Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00661 AC: 1660AN: 251282Hom.: 44 AF XY: 0.00687 AC XY: 933AN XY: 135884
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00233 AC: 3410AN: 1461654Hom.: 78 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00277 AC XY: 2013AN XY: 727126
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00248 AC: 378AN: 152358Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00303 AC XY: 226AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 15, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 03, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 05, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia due to ubiquinone deficiency Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 07, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at