rs76258355

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):c.1975G>A(p.Val659Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00394 in 1,612,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 216 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 109 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 107 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.19

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]

OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOGL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026710331).

BP6

Variant 12-80262054-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80262054-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0687 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	NM_001378609.3 link	c.1975G>A	p.Val659Ile	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 59	ENST00000547103.7	NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	ENST00000547103.7 link	c.1975G>A	p.Val659Ile	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 59	5	NM_001378609.3	ENSP00000447211.2	Q3ZCN5
OTOGL	ENST00000646859.1 link	c.1975G>A	p.Val659Ile	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 63			ENSP00000496036.1	A0A2R8YF04
OTOGL	ENST00000643417.1 link	n.2635G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 22 of 23

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0206

AC:

3139

AN:

152120

Hom.:

110

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0710

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00951

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0134

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00552

AC:

1359

AN:

246362

AF XY:

0.00418

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0766

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00352

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000281

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00299

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00220

AC:

3210

AN:

1460416

Hom.:

107

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00195

AC XY:

1420

AN XY:

726470

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0759

AC:

2537

AN:

33418

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00415

AC:

185

AN:

44588

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000766

AC:

AN:

26098

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39640

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000163

AC:

AN:

86132

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53358

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00538

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

147

AN:

1111098

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00486

AC:

293

AN:

60320

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

144

288

432

576

720

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

168

252

336

420

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0206

AC:

3141

AN:

152238

Hom.:

109

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0197

AC XY:

1467

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0708

AC:

2944

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00949

AC:

145

AN:

15272

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000338

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0132

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

142

284

426

568

710

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00726

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0239

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0633

AC:

240

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000121

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00670

AC:

810

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00549

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Dec 18, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Val650Ile in exon 18 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 6.3% (240/3792) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs76258355). -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.063

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.73

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

Eigen

Uncertain

0.20

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.33

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.81

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

T;.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0027

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

PhyloP100

2.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.31

.;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.088

Sift

Benign

0.50

.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.56

.;.;T

Vest4

0.17

MVP

0.067

MPC

0.024

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

5.6

gMVP

0.21

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over