rs762625437
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.972G>T(p.Gln324His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000682 in 1,612,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q324L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAD51D | ENST00000345365.11 | c.972G>T | p.Gln324His | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 10 | 1 | NM_002878.4 | ENSP00000338790.6 | ||
| ENSG00000267618 | ENST00000593039.5 | c.426+233G>T | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 6 | 2 | ENSP00000466834.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251490 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1460794Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000826 AC XY: 6AN XY: 726774 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with breast cancer (Tung et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19327148, 21111057, 14704354, 26976419) -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 324 of the RAD51D protein (p.Gln324His). This variant is present in population databases (rs762625437, gnomAD 0.002%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 26976419). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 185169). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at