Menu
GeneBe

rs762815401

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6938-25_6938-19del variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000038 in 1,526,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 intron

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 13-32346795-CTAATATG-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32346795-CTAATATG-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 420655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-32346795-CTAATATG-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6938-25_6938-19del intron_variant ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6938-25_6938-19del intron_variant 5 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000132
AC:
2
AN:
151968
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000566
AC:
13
AN:
229588
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000401
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
124746
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000408
AC:
56
AN:
1374202
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000364
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
686654
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000132
AC:
2
AN:
152084
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74316
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 16, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 12, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6938-25_6938-19delGTAATAT alters a nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.6e-05 in 230226 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00077 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (5.6e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.6938-25_6938-19delGTAATAT has been reported in the literature as IVS12-25del7 in at-least one individual of Chinese ethnicity reportedly affected with benign breast disease (Suter_2004). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Since its previous evaluation as a likely benign variant at our laboratory, we have observed at-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) (BRCA1 c.1518delG , p.Arg507AspfsX25 and BRCA1 c.2800C>T, p.Gln934X) that could explain the phenotype in affected individuals, providing additional supporting evidence for a benign role.To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was re-classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
La Branchor
0.60

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs762815401; hg19: chr13-32920932; API