rs762898756
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1626C>A(p.His542Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H542R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000245.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary papillary renal cell carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- papillary renal cell carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 97Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- osteofibrous dysplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- arthrogryposis, distal, IIa 11Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET | NM_000245.4 | c.1626C>A | p.His542Gln | missense_variant | Exon 5 of 21 | ENST00000397752.8 | NP_000236.2 | 
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.00000137  AC: 2AN: 1461886Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.00000138  AC XY: 1AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome  
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Renal cell carcinoma    Uncertain:1 
This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 542 of the MET protein (p.His542Gln). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 836570). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MET protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome    Uncertain:1 
The p.H542Q variant (also known as c.1626C>A), located in coding exon 4 of the MET gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 1626. The histidine at codon 542 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at