rs76297160

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):c.1126A>G(p.Ile376Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00198 in 1,588,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 62 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 32 hom. )

Consequence

OTOGL
NM_001378609.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.49

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOGL (HGNC:26901): (otogelin like) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the otogelin family. This gene is expressed in the inner ear of vertebrates with the highest level of expression seen at the embryonic stage and lowest in adult. Knockdown studies in zebrafish suggest that this gene is essential for normal inner ear function. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]

OTOGL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 84B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOGL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004940301).

BP6

Variant 12-80251766-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-80251766-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226926.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1589/152230) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.036 (1496/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0345. There are 30 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 748 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	NM_001378609.3 link	c.1126A>G	p.Ile376Val	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 59	ENST00000547103.7	NP_001365538.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOGL	ENST00000547103.7 link	c.1126A>G	p.Ile376Val	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 59	5	NM_001378609.3	ENSP00000447211.2	Q3ZCN5
OTOGL	ENST00000646859.1 link	c.1126A>G	p.Ile376Val	missense_variant	Exon 17 of 63			ENSP00000496036.1	A0A2R8YF04
OTOGL	ENST00000643417.1 link	n.1786A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 15 of 23

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1584

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0360

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00471

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00718

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00272

AC:

562

AN:

206564

AF XY:

0.00218

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0389

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000792

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00133

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00109

AC:

1562

AN:

1436450

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000974

AC XY:

693

AN XY:

711600

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0393

AC:

1302

AN:

33134

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00199

AC:

AN:

41118

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25580

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39024

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000366

AC:

AN:

81994

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51998

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00122

AC:

AN:

5720

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000300

AC:

AN:

1098398

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00227

AC:

135

AN:

59484

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.465

Heterozygous variant carriers

129

193

258

322

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

132

176

220

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1589

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0100

AC XY:

748

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0360

AC:

1496

AN:

41528

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00471

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00710

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

166

248

331

414

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00381

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0119

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0356

AC:

135

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000121

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00283

AC:

341

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00346

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ile367Val in exon 11 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 3.6% (135/3794) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs76297160). -

Feb 12, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.082

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.53

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

Eigen

Benign

-0.018

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.13

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.74

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

T;.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0049

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

PhyloP100

3.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.58

.;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.17

Sift

Benign

0.58

.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.88

.;.;T

Vest4

0.15

MVP

0.34

MPC

0.021

ClinPred

0.013

GERP RS

4.3

gMVP

0.25

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over