rs762990578

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):c.2444A>C(p.Asn815Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000083 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.67

Variant links:

Genes affected

APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

APC links:

ENSG00000258864 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000258864 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1295121).

BP6

Variant 5-112838038-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112838038-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 216156.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=8, Likely_benign=2}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 131 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
APC	NM_000038.6 link	c.2444A>C	p.Asn815Thr	missense_variant	16/16	ENST00000257430.9	NP_000029.2	P25054-1Q4LE70

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
APC	ENST00000257430.9 link	c.2444A>C	p.Asn815Thr	missense_variant	16/16	5	NM_000038.6	ENSP00000257430.4		P25054-1
ENSG00000258864	ENST00000520401.1 link	n.228+9066A>C		intron_variant		3		ENSP00000454861.1		H3BNH8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

250882

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000295

AC XY:

AN XY:

135658

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000529

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

131

AN:

1461850

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000908

AC XY:

AN XY:

727228

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000117

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000675

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Jul 26, 2016	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Feb 16, 2023	This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Jan 26, 2023	This missense variant replaces asparagine with threonine at codon 815 of the APC protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 7/282288 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	True Health Diagnostics	Jun 15, 2018	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jan 05, 2017	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 05, 2024	Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28481359) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	Oct 16, 2017	- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Aug 09, 2019

Variant summary: APC c.2444A>C (p.Asn815Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 250882 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2444A>C in individuals affected with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (4x VUS, 2x likely benign). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

May 09, 2024

This missense variant replaces asparagine with threonine at codon 815 of the APC protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with APC-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 7/282288 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.084

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.25

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.87

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.55

.;D;D;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.28

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.079

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Benign

0.83

T;.;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.13

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.47

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.81

.;L;L;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.19

N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.11

T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.33

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0020

.;B;B;.

Vest4

0.26, 0.28

MutPred

0.28

.;Gain of helix (P = 0.005);Gain of helix (P = 0.005);Gain of helix (P = 0.005);

MVP

0.84

ClinPred

0.048

GERP RS

3.6

Varity_R

0.058

gMVP

0.28

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over