rs763374929

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.12027C>T​(p.Asn4009=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000366 in 1,612,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000038 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.74
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 1-237783739-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237783739-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 296757.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.74 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 56 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.12027C>T p.Asn4009= synonymous_variant 90/105 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.12027C>T p.Asn4009= synonymous_variant 90/1051 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533 P1Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.12048C>T p.Asn4016= synonymous_variant 91/106 ENSP00000499787
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.12015C>T p.Asn4005= synonymous_variant 90/105 ENSP00000499653
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3119C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 89/1045 ENSP00000499659

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000487
AC:
12
AN:
246436
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000524
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
133596
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000292
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000333
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000932
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000716
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000384
AC:
56
AN:
1460192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000330
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
726182
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000349
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000342
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000829
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.0000658
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpSep 17, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 19, 2017- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 18, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 13, 2023- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJul 02, 2019- -
RYR2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 26, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 18, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
0.32
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs763374929; hg19: chr1-237947039; COSMIC: COSV100773485; API