Menu
GeneBe

rs76368635

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 1P and 17B. PP2BP4BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.4198C>T(p.Arg1400Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00186 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1400L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense

Scores

6
8
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, MYH9
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.33464932).
BP6
Variant 22-36292132-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36292132-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44562.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00117 (178/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00196 (133/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00168. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 78 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 178 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.4198C>T p.Arg1400Trp missense_variant 31/41 ENST00000216181.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.4198C>T p.Arg1400Trp missense_variant 31/411 NM_002473.6 P1P35579-1
MYH9ENST00000685801.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4261C>T p.Arg1421Trp missense_variant 32/42
MYH9ENST00000691109.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.4493C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 25/35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00117
AC:
178
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00195
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000998
AC:
251
AN:
251412
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000971
AC XY:
132
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000665
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00193
AC:
2824
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
1332
AN XY:
727206
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00177
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00117
AC:
178
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00105
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00158
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00133
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00297
AC:
11
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00221
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.000955
AC:
116
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00131
EpiControl
AF:
0.00184

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024MYH9: BS1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 05, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 15, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30720677, 11752022, 22123909, 30245029, 22477015, 27577878, 26764160, 24448499, 22995991, 20981092) -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 04, 2013Arg1400Trp in exon 31 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 7/122 (5.7%) control chromosomes (Be rg 2013) and has been seen in 0.2% (19/6980) of European American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs7 6368635). It has been reported in the literature in individuals with macrothromb ocytopenia with or without renal impairment (Arrondel 2001, Jang 2012, Sanborn 2 011), however lack of clear segregation with disease and limited control informa tion in these studies do not support a strong association between this variant and macrothrombocytopenia. In summary, the frequency of this variant in the gene ral population supports a benign role. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 12, 2016- -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 23, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.020
Cadd
Pathogenic
28
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.83
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.56
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.50
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.37
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.33
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.12
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.9
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.67
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.77
MVP
0.78
MPC
1.4
ClinPred
0.082
T
GERP RS
2.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.97
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.8
Varity_R
0.49
gMVP
0.37

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76368635; hg19: chr22-36688178; API