Menu
GeneBe

rs763841075

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PP3_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_002087.4(GRN):c.415T>C(p.Cys139Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,612,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GRN
NM_002087.4 missense

Scores

12
5
2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.06
Variant links:
Genes affected
GRN (HGNC:4601): (granulin precursor) Granulins are a family of secreted, glycosylated peptides that are cleaved from a single precursor protein with 7.5 repeats of a highly conserved 12-cysteine granulin/epithelin motif. The 88 kDa precursor protein, progranulin, is also called proepithelin and PC cell-derived growth factor. Cleavage of the signal peptide produces mature granulin which can be further cleaved into a variety of active, 6 kDa peptides. These smaller cleavage products are named granulin A, granulin B, granulin C, etc. Epithelins 1 and 2 are synonymous with granulins A and B, respectively. Both the peptides and intact granulin protein regulate cell growth. However, different members of the granulin protein family may act as inhibitors, stimulators, or have dual actions on cell growth. Granulin family members are important in normal development, wound healing, and tumorigenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.988
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000146 (214/1461708) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00416 (24/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00287. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 111 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GRNNM_002087.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.415T>C p.Cys139Arg missense_variant 5/13 ENST00000053867.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GRNENST00000053867.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.415T>C p.Cys139Arg missense_variant 5/131 NM_002087.4 P1P28799-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000992
AC:
15
AN:
151196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000484
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000179
AC:
45
AN:
251476
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000228
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000146
AC:
214
AN:
1461708
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000153
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
727170
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000374
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000182
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000992
AC:
15
AN:
151196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
73754
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000484
Alfa
AF:
0.000243
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000121
ExAC
AF:
0.000181
AC:
22
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

GRN-related frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Tdp43 inclusions;C3539123:Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 11 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 15, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 08, 2024This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 139 of the GRN protein (p.Cys139Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs763841075, gnomAD 0.04%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with frontotemporal dementia or Alzheimer disease (PMID: 21800185, 23724906, 24503614, 27632209, 27997711, 34162492, 34435519). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 589965). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt GRN protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects GRN function (PMID: 20028451, 22781549, 26652843). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 13, 2020Reported previously in association with a wide spectrum of later-onset ALS-FTLD neurological phenotypes (Brouwers et al., 2008; Piaceri et al., 2014; Redaelli et al., 2018); Asymptomatic carriers of this variant have been found to have lower serum/plasma PGRN levels compared to controls but not as low as in cases with null variants, suggesting a partial loss of function (Sleegers et al., 2009; Finch et al., 2009; Guven et al., 2019); Published functional studies demonstrate that this variant leads to reduced neurite outgrowth stimulating activity compared to wild type (Wang et al., 2010); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32772750, 24503614, 27997711, 19158106, 19288468, 30475763, 18565828, 25352065, 23392204, 26444794, 18314228, 20020531, 23742080, 25575133, 26652843, 27632209, 23684369, 22647257, 20028451, 23724906, 21800185, 31031559) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2019- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 13, 2017The p.C139R variant (also known as c.415T>C), located in coding exon 4 of the GRN gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 415. The cysteine at codon 139 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration has been detected in several individuals with frontal lobe temporal dementia, progressive late onset dementia, and corticobasal syndrome (Brouwers N et al. Neurology, 2008 Aug;71:656-64; Finch N et al. Brain, 2009 Mar;132:583-91; Bernardi L et al. Neurobiol. Aging, 2009 Nov;30:1825-33; Gómez-Tortosa E et al. Eur. J. Neurol., 2013 Sep;20:1319-24; Bagnoli S et al. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol., 2012 Jan;32:13-6; Rodríguez-Rodríguez E et al. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord., 2013 Aug;19:768-9; Guven G et al. PLoS ONE, 2016 Sep;11:e0162592). In vitro functional studes have shown this variant is likely to impair the physiological processing of the protein and structural modeling predicts this variant has a destabilizing effect on the protein (Brouwers N et al. Neurology, 2008 Aug;71:656-64; Wang J et al. J. Neurochem., 2010 Mar;112:1305-15; Karch CM et al. Neurobiol. Aging, 2016 Feb;38:215.e1-12). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
GRN-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 23, 2023The GRN c.415T>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Cys139Arg. The c.415T>C variant has been reported in patients with various neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, progressive nonfluent aphasia, and corticobasal syndrome (Bernardi L et al. 2008. PubMed ID: 18314228; Bagnoli S et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21800185; Antonell et al . 2012. PubMed ID: 22647257; Piaceri et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24503614; Redaelli et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27997711; Guven et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27632209). In one report the c.415T>C variant detected in a patient with progressive nonfluent aphasia but also in two unaffected family members age 66 and 42 years of age (Antonell A et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22647257). While mutant GRN protein levels did not differ from non-carrier family members, in an axonal outgrowth assay, the p.Cys139Arg mutated PGRNs did not stimulate neurite outgrowth (Wang J et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 20028451). The c.415T>C variant has also been reported in over 40 individuals in gnomAD and has been interpreted as uncertain by several other laboratories in ClinVar. At this time the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
GRN-related frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Tdp43 inclusions Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CenterMar 26, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.96
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.27
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.47
Cadd
Uncertain
25
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
T;T;.;T;T;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.65
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.47
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.71
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.99
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.93
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.9
H;.;.;.;.;.;H
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.65
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-11
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.84
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.94
MVP
1.0
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.99
D
GERP RS
4.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.91
gMVP
0.98

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs763841075; hg19: chr17-42427661; API