rs764244718
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000077.5(CDKN2A):c.-14C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000324 in 1,565,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CDKN2A
NM_000077.5 5_prime_UTR
NM_000077.5 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.132
Genes affected
CDKN2A (HGNC:1787): (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) This gene generates several transcript variants which differ in their first exons. At least three alternatively spliced variants encoding distinct proteins have been reported, two of which encode structurally related isoforms known to function as inhibitors of CDK4 kinase. The remaining transcript includes an alternate first exon located 20 Kb upstream of the remainder of the gene; this transcript contains an alternate open reading frame (ARF) that specifies a protein which is structurally unrelated to the products of the other variants. This ARF product functions as a stabilizer of the tumor suppressor protein p53 as it can interact with, and sequester, the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2, a protein responsible for the degradation of p53. In spite of the structural and functional differences, the CDK inhibitor isoforms and the ARF product encoded by this gene, through the regulatory roles of CDK4 and p53 in cell cycle G1 progression, share a common functionality in cell cycle G1 control. This gene is frequently mutated or deleted in a wide variety of tumors, and is known to be an important tumor suppressor gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 9-21974841-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-21974841-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 221032.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 33 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | NM_000077.5 | c.-14C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000304494.10 | NP_000068.1 | ||
CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | c.194-3633C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000579755.2 | NP_478102.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | ENST00000304494.10 | c.-14C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_000077.5 | ENSP00000307101.5 | |||
CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | c.194-3633C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_058195.4 | ENSP00000462950.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 151952Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
151952
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000238 AC: 42AN: 176368Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 21AN XY: 97728
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
176368
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
97728
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000336 AC: 475AN: 1413554Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 227AN XY: 700534
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
475
AN:
1413554
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
227
AN XY:
700534
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152070
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74352
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 18, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 25, 2015 | The c.-14C>T alteration is located in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of the CDKN2A gene. This alteration consists of a C to T substitution nucleotides upstream from the first translated codon. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 08, 2016 | - - |
Melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 20, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 22, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 29, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
CDKN2A-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 31, 2024 | The CDKN2A c.194-3633C>T variant is predicted to interfere with splicing. This variant occurs in the regulatory region of the alternative p16INK4A transcript for this gene (NM_000077.4:c.-14C>T). This variant has previously been reported in individuals with multiple cutaneous melanomas (Hashemi et al. 2000. PubMed ID: 11156381; Goldstein et al. 2008. PubMed ID: 18178632; Additional file 2 - Harland et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25780468) and breast cancer (Supporting table 1 - Tung et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25186627). However, in vitro studies indicated that this variant may not have a significance impact on CDKN2A mRNA translation (Andreotti et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 26581427). In the gnomAD public population database this variant has been reported in up to ~0.046% of alleles in a subpopulation and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/221032/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Familial melanoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 10, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at