rs765185645

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.46A>G(p.Lys16Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000293 in 1,604,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.42

Variant links:

Genes affected

POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

POLD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1666153).

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 43 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
POLD1	NM_002691.4 link	c.46A>G	p.Lys16Glu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 27	ENST00000440232.7	NP_002682.2	P28340A0A024R4F4Q59FA0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
POLD1	ENST00000440232.7 link	c.46A>G	p.Lys16Glu	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 27	1	NM_002691.4	ENSP00000406046.1		P28340

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000388

AC:

AN:

232016

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000637

AC XY:

AN XY:

125598

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000571

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000960

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000296

AC:

AN:

1451902

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000444

AC XY:

AN XY:

721372

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000388

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000127

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000307

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000902

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000167

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000268

AC XY:

AN XY:

74504

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ExAC

AF:

0.0000495

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer

Uncertain:1

Oct 01, 2016

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Found in patient having exome sequencing due to suspicion for hereditary colon cancer and/or polyps. Patient is a 43 year old female with a history of 1 colon polyp and family history of colon cancer. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Nov 02, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with pancreatic cancer who also harbored a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (Borazanci et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: Botrus2022[article], 31391296) -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10

Uncertain:1

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 16 of the POLD1 protein (p.Lys16Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs765185645, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 496661). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (internal data). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The POLD1 p.Lys16Glu variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs765185645) as â€šÃ„Ãºwith uncertain significance alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹ and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae and University of Washington). The variant was identified in control databases in 11 of 258,648 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European in 3 of 117,476 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 9552 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), East Asian in 1 of 18,040 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006) and South Asian in 6 of 28,810 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002). The variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino and Finnish populations. The p.Lys16 residue is conserved in in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Oct 17, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.58

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.35

T;.;.;.;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.13

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.091

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.63

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

.;.;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.17

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.55

N;.;.;.;N;.

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.84

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

N;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.058

Sift

Benign

0.066

T;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.14

T;T;D;T;T;D

Polyphen

0.23

B;.;.;.;B;.

Vest4

0.45

MutPred

0.23

Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);Loss of methylation at K16 (P = 0.0026);

MVP

0.63

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.096

GERP RS

3.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.093

gMVP

0.52

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over