rs76547988
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000018.4(ACADVL):c.636C>T(p.Ala212Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00107 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 10 hom. )
Consequence
ACADVL
NM_000018.4 synonymous
NM_000018.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -7.07
Genes affected
ACADVL (HGNC:92): (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase very long chain) The protein encoded by this gene is targeted to the inner mitochondrial membrane where it catalyzes the first step of the mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway. This acyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase is specific to long-chain and very-long-chain fatty acids. A deficiency in this gene product reduces myocardial fatty acid beta-oxidation and is associated with cardiomyopathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 17-7221965-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7221965-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 324988.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-7.07 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00521 (793/152228) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0179 (743/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0168. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 370 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACADVL | NM_000018.4 | c.636C>T | p.Ala212Ala | synonymous_variant | 8/20 | ENST00000356839.10 | NP_000009.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACADVL | ENST00000356839.10 | c.636C>T | p.Ala212Ala | synonymous_variant | 8/20 | 1 | NM_000018.4 | ENSP00000349297.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00523 AC: 795AN: 152110Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
795
AN:
152110
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00144 AC: 361AN: 251296Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00119 AC XY: 161AN XY: 135862
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
361
AN:
251296
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
135862
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000640 AC: 936AN: 1461860Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000606 AC XY: 441AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
936
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
441
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00521 AC: 793AN: 152228Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00497 AC XY: 370AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
793
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
370
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency Benign:5
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen ACADVL Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Mar 06, 2022 | The c.636C>T (p.Ala212=) variant is a synonymous (silent) variant that is not predicted by Splice AI to impact splicing. In addition, it occurs at a nucleotide that is not conserved as shown by PhyloP (BP7). The highest population minor allele frequency in gnomAD 3.1.2 is 0.01799 in the African/African American population, which is higher than the ClinGen ACADVL Variant Curation Expert Panel threshold (≥0.007) for BA1. To our knowledge, this variant is not in the literature in a proband with VLCAD or ACADVL associated disease or in functional studies. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal recessive very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (VLCAD) deficiency based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen ACADVL Variant Curation Expert Panel: BA1, BP7. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 15, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 17, 2017 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 14, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at