rs765544741
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001278629.2(C9orf43):c.293C>G(p.Pro98Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,456,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P98L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001278629.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9orf43 | NM_001278629.2 | c.293C>G | p.Pro98Arg | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 14 | ENST00000374165.6 | NP_001265558.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9orf43 | ENST00000374165.6 | c.293C>G | p.Pro98Arg | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 14 | 1 | NM_001278629.2 | ENSP00000363280.1 | ||
C9orf43 | ENST00000288462.4 | c.293C>G | p.Pro98Arg | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 14 | 1 | ENSP00000288462.4 | |||
C9orf43 | ENST00000490544.1 | n.446C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000404 AC: 1AN: 247722 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.86e-7 AC: 1AN: 1456810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 724510 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at