rs76579307

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):​c.3680+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.22 in 1,525,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39,304 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.20 ( 3347 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.22 ( 35957 hom. )

Consequence

MYH14
NM_001145809.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.50

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 19-50276212-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50276212-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44067.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.236 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH14NM_001145809.2 linkc.3680+9C>T intron_variant Intron 28 of 42 ENST00000642316.2 NP_001139281.1 Q7Z406-2A1L2Z2B3KWH4
MYH14NM_001077186.2 linkc.3581+9C>T intron_variant Intron 27 of 41 NP_001070654.1 Q7Z406-6B3KWH4
MYH14NM_024729.4 linkc.3557+9C>T intron_variant Intron 26 of 40 NP_079005.3 Q7Z406-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH14ENST00000642316.2 linkc.3680+9C>T intron_variant Intron 28 of 42 NM_001145809.2 ENSP00000493594.1 Q7Z406-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.201
AC:
30533
AN:
152090
Hom.:
3347
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.156
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.391
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.165
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.155
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0322
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.115
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.301
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.136
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.239
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.195
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.184
AC:
24583
AN:
133464
AF XY:
0.182
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.161
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.301
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.239
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.222
AC:
305190
AN:
1373770
Hom.:
35957
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.219
AC XY:
148194
AN XY:
675730
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.152
AC:
4710
AN:
31070
American (AMR)
AF:
0.146
AC:
4990
AN:
34226
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.162
AC:
3929
AN:
24288
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
628
AN:
35474
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.121
AC:
9366
AN:
77232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.291
AC:
12944
AN:
44530
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.152
AC:
608
AN:
3992
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.241
AC:
256812
AN:
1066124
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.197
AC:
11203
AN:
56834
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11519
23038
34556
46075
57594
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8720
17440
26160
34880
43600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.201
AC:
30539
AN:
152208
Hom.:
3347
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.201
AC XY:
14966
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.156
AC:
6483
AN:
41546
American (AMR)
AF:
0.165
AC:
2526
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.155
AC:
537
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0323
AC:
167
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.115
AC:
553
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.301
AC:
3185
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.139
AC:
41
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.240
AC:
16283
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.193
AC:
407
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1253
2505
3758
5010
6263
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
322
644
966
1288
1610
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.216
Hom.:
813
Bravo
AF:
0.190
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0960
AC:
333
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 30, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

3680+9C>T in Intron 28 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequ ence and has been identified in 21.5% (1419/6596) of European American chromosom es from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs. washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs76579307). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.23
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
-3.5
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76579307; hg19: chr19-50779469; API