rs766076524
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_004174.4(SLC9A3):c.1145G>C(p.Arg382Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000718 in 1,392,584 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R382W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004174.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital secretory sodium diarrhea 8Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- congenital sodium diarrheaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cystic fibrosisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC9A3 | ENST00000264938.8 | c.1145G>C | p.Arg382Pro | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 17 | 1 | NM_004174.4 | ENSP00000264938.3 | ||
| SLC9A3 | ENST00000514375.1 | c.1145G>C | p.Arg382Pro | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 17 | 1 | ENSP00000422983.1 | |||
| SLC9A3 | ENST00000644203.1 | c.1145G>C | p.Arg382Pro | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 16 | ENSP00000495903.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.18e-7 AC: 1AN: 1392584Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 684938 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at