rs766153965

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001017995.3(SH3PXD2B):c.2189C>T(p.Pro730Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000601 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P730P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SH3PXD2B
NM_001017995.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.753

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SH3PXD2B (HGNC:29242): (SH3 and PX domains 2B) This gene encodes an adapter protein that is characterized by a PX domain and four Src homology 3 domains. The encoded protein is required for podosome formation and is involved in cell adhesion and migration of numerous cell types. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Frank-ter Haar syndrome (FTHS), and also Borrone Dermato-Cardio-Skeletal (BDCS) syndrome. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

SH3PXD2B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Frank-Ter Haar syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet

SH3PXD2B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.032655865).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000177 (27/152212) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00124 (19/15278). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000814. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 17 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SH3PXD2B	NM_001017995.3 link	c.2189C>T	p.Pro730Leu	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000311601.6	NP_001017995.1	A1X283
SH3PXD2B	XM_017009351.2 link	c.2273C>T	p.Pro758Leu	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 14		XP_016864840.1
SH3PXD2B	NM_001308175.2 link	c.1188+7220C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 12		NP_001295104.1	G3V144

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SH3PXD2B	ENST00000311601.6 link	c.2189C>T	p.Pro730Leu	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_001017995.3	ENSP00000309714.5	A1X283
SH3PXD2B	ENST00000519643.5 link	c.1188+7220C>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 12	1		ENSP00000430890.1	G3V144
SH3PXD2B	ENST00000636523.1 link	c.1227+7220C>T		intron_variant	Intron 13 of 13	5		ENSP00000490082.1	A0A1B0GUF2
SH3PXD2B	ENST00000518522.5 link	c.199-5147C>T		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 3	5		ENSP00000428076.1	H0YAU1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000798

AC:

AN:

250484

AF XY:

0.0000737

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000479

AC:

AN:

1461738

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000495

AC XY:

AN XY:

727126

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000268

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00208

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000333

AC:

AN:

1111892

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

60386

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.494

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000229

AC XY:

AN XY:

74354

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000482

AC:

AN:

41462

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

314

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000987

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000113

ExAC

AF:

0.0000577

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 11, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Frank-Ter Haar syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 20, 2024

3billion

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The homozygous variant was found in patients diagnosed with another variant in a different gene, with no symptoms related to the gene containing the homozygous variant. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

May 16, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.2189C>T (p.P730L) alteration is located in exon 13 (coding exon 13) of the SH3PXD2B gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2189, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 730 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

SH3PXD2B-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Sep 20, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The SH3PXD2B c.2189C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro730Leu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.026% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.067

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.37

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.82

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.097

Eigen

Benign

-0.99

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.98

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.10

LIST_S2

Benign

0.70

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.033

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

PhyloP100

0.75

PrimateAI

Benign

0.38

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

REVEL

Benign

0.062

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

Sift4G

Benign

0.19

Polyphen

0.010

Vest4

0.058

MutPred

0.19

Loss of glycosylation at P730 (P = 0.0123);

MVP

0.10

MPC

0.14

ClinPred

0.053

GERP RS

2.7

Varity_R

0.095

gMVP

0.20

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over