rs766261022
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points: 13P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000312.4(PROC):c.1019C>A(p.Thr340Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T340M) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000312.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary thrombophilia due to congenital protein C deficiencyInheritance: AD, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- thrombophilia due to protein C deficiency, autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- thrombophilia due to protein C deficiency, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROC | ENST00000234071.8 | c.1019C>A | p.Thr340Lys | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | 1 | NM_000312.4 | ENSP00000234071.4 | ||
| PROC | ENST00000409048.1 | c.1121C>A | p.Thr374Lys | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | 5 | ENSP00000386679.1 | |||
| PROC | ENST00000402125.2 | c.341C>A | p.Thr114Lys | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 2 | ENSP00000384225.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Reduced protein C activity Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at