Menu
GeneBe

rs76634951

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):c.777C>T(p.Ser259=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0219 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 505 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 38 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 467 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.69
Variant links:
Genes affected
RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)
HOOK2 (HGNC:19885): (hook microtubule tethering protein 2) Hook proteins are cytosolic coiled-coil proteins that contain conserved N-terminal domains, which attach to microtubules, and more divergent C-terminal domains, which mediate binding to organelles. The Drosophila Hook protein is a component of the endocytic compartment.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2004]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 19-12813343-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12813343-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 328297.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-12813343-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.69 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0854 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RNASEH2ANM_006397.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.777C>T p.Ser259= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000221486.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RNASEH2AENST00000221486.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.777C>T p.Ser259= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_006397.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3275
AN:
152090
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0187
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0293
AC:
7353
AN:
251156
Hom.:
178
AF XY:
0.0268
AC XY:
3646
AN XY:
135802
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0227
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0225
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0219
AC:
32002
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
467
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0216
AC XY:
15741
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0877
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0239
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0201
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3279
AN:
152208
Hom.:
38
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0224
AC XY:
1668
AN XY:
74404
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0450
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0279
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0190
Alfa
AF:
0.0189
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0236
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0170
AC:
60
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0170
EpiControl
AF:
0.0189

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 31, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
Cadd
Benign
0.12
Dann
Benign
0.39
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76634951; hg19: chr19-12924157; COSMIC: COSV55551440; COSMIC: COSV55551440; API