rs7671781

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001166108.2(PALLD):​c.672G>A​(p.Met224Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.309 in 1,613,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 78,961 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M224T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.29 ( 6561 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.31 ( 72400 hom. )

Consequence

PALLD
NM_001166108.2 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.94

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PALLD (HGNC:17068): (palladin, cytoskeletal associated protein) This gene encodes a cytoskeletal protein that is required for organizing the actin cytoskeleton. The protein is a component of actin-containing microfilaments, and it is involved in the control of cell shape, adhesion, and contraction. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with a susceptibility to pancreatic cancer type 1, and also with a risk for myocardial infarction. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DDX60L (HGNC:26429): (DExD/H-box 60 like) This gene encodes a member of the DExD/H-box helicase family of proteins, a subset of the super family 2 helicases. Members of the DExD/H-box helicase family share a conserved functional core comprised of two RecA-like globular domains. These domains contain conserved motifs that mediate ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, nucleic acid binding, and RNA unwinding. In addition to functions in RNA metabolism, members of this family are involved in anti-viral immunity and act as cytosolic sensors of viral nucleic acids. The protein encoded by this gene has been shown to inhibit hepatitis C virus replication in response to interferon stimulation in cell culture. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0010214746).
BP6
Variant 4-168512176-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-168512176-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 403285.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.327 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PALLDNM_001166108.2 linkc.672G>A p.Met224Ile missense_variant Exon 2 of 22 ENST00000505667.6 NP_001159580.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PALLDENST00000505667.6 linkc.672G>A p.Met224Ile missense_variant Exon 2 of 22 1 NM_001166108.2 ENSP00000425556.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.293
AC:
44444
AN:
151670
Hom.:
6556
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.246
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.388
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.242
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.281
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.191
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.219
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.394
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.272
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.330
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.280
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.281
AC:
70311
AN:
250460
AF XY:
0.282
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.180
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.297
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.399
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.325
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.294
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.311
AC:
454076
AN:
1461412
Hom.:
72400
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.309
AC XY:
224372
AN XY:
727018
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.244
AC:
8151
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.188
AC:
8406
AN:
44700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.298
AC:
7779
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.194
AC:
7700
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.225
AC:
19407
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.393
AC:
20997
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.239
AC:
1377
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.326
AC:
362327
AN:
1111642
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.297
AC:
17932
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18632
37263
55895
74526
93158
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11530
23060
34590
46120
57650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.293
AC:
44463
AN:
151790
Hom.:
6561
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.292
AC XY:
21619
AN XY:
74134
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.246
AC:
10214
AN:
41444
American (AMR)
AF:
0.241
AC:
3684
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.281
AC:
972
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.191
AC:
985
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.219
AC:
1052
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.394
AC:
4152
AN:
10538
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.286
AC:
84
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.330
AC:
22390
AN:
67804
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.276
AC:
582
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1603
3207
4810
6414
8017
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
436
872
1308
1744
2180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.309
Hom.:
7866
Bravo
AF:
0.280
TwinsUK
AF:
0.309
AC:
1147
ALSPAC
AF:
0.333
AC:
1284
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.242
AC:
1065
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.305
AC:
2624
ExAC
AF:
0.285
AC:
34602
Asia WGS
AF:
0.196
AC:
683
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.319
EpiControl
AF:
0.315

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jul 30, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.20
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.77
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
0.0020
DANN
Benign
0.80
Eigen
Benign
-2.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.048
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.19
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0010
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;N;.
PhyloP100
-4.9
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.090
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.045
Sift
Benign
0.21
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.49
T;T;T
Vest4
0.030
MutPred
0.19
Gain of glycosylation at S220 (P = 0.0087);Gain of glycosylation at S220 (P = 0.0087);.;
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
-11
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7671781; hg19: chr4-169433327; COSMIC: COSV54981267; COSMIC: COSV54981267; API