rs767234031

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.14406A>G(p.Pro4802Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.00

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RYR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 1-237809008-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237809008-A-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 384558.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3 link	c.14406A>G	p.Pro4802Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 100 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2	Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7 link	c.14406A>G	p.Pro4802Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 100 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2	Q92736-1
RYR2	ENST00000661330.2 link	c.14424A>G	p.Pro4808Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 101 of 106			ENSP00000499393.2	A0A590UJF6
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*5498A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 99 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*5498A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 99 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000804

AC:

AN:

248816

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000205

AC:

AN:

1461138

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

726880

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000598

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39684

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86198

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53390

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5754

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

9.00e-7

AC:

AN:

1111450

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60354

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.00109982), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.375

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74398

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000482

AC:

AN:

41478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5204

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68046

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000743

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 09, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:1

Jun 27, 2021

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 30, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

0.20

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

-1.0

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over