rs767368987

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.8580C>T(p.Ser2860Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000725 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000073 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.12

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CHARGE syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, ClinGen, G2P
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Kallmann syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Omenn syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).

BP6

Variant 8-60865519-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60865519-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 363484.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.12 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000723 (11/152234) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.000523 (8/15294). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00026. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 7 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017780.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	CHD7	NM_017780.4	MANE Select	c.8580C>T	p.Ser2860Ser	synonymous	Exon 38 of 38	NP_060250.2
	CHD7	NM_001316690.1		c.2433C>T	p.Ser811Ser	synonymous	Exon 5 of 5	NP_001303619.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.8580C>T	p.Ser2860Ser	synonymous	Exon 38 of 38	ENSP00000392028.1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5	TSL:1	c.2433C>T	p.Ser811Ser	synonymous	Exon 5 of 5	ENSP00000437061.1
CHD7	ENST00000695850.1		n.1756C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 7 of 7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000963

AC:

AN:

249282

AF XY:

0.0000813

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000521

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000442

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000725

AC:

106

AN:

1461704

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000715

AC XY:

AN XY:

727134

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000537

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53394

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000720

AC:

AN:

1111870

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.461

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74374

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000523

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4838

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.534

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000510

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000166

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

May 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CHD7: BP4, BP7, BS1

May 15, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

To our knowledge, the c.8580 C>T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant nor has it been reported as a benign variant. It was not observed in approximately 6,400 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. This nucleotide change occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals and results in a synonymous amino acid substitution. It is not predicted to affect splicing; however, the actual effect of the c.8580 C>T sequence change in vivo is unknown in the absence of RNA studies. Additionally, few pathogenic missense variants have been reported in CHARGE syndrome, as most pathogenic variants introduce a premature termination codon. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether c.8580 C>T, or S2860S, is a disease-causing or rare benign variant.

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Nov 04, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

3.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over