rs767717597
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001128425.2(MUTYH):c.389-4C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001128425.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial adenomatous polyposis 2Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P
- colorectal cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUTYH | NM_001128425.2 | c.389-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 15 | ENST00000710952.2 | NP_001121897.1 | ||
| MUTYH | NM_001048174.2 | c.305-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 15 | ENST00000456914.7 | NP_001041639.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUTYH | ENST00000710952.2 | c.389-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 15 | NM_001128425.2 | ENSP00000518552.2 | ||||
| MUTYH | ENST00000456914.7 | c.305-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 4 of 15 | 1 | NM_001048174.2 | ENSP00000407590.2 | |||
| ENSG00000288208 | ENST00000671898.1 | n.893-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 8 of 20 | ENSP00000499896.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251368 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at