rs767999682

Variant names:

• chr8-93755034-T-C
• rs767999682
• NM_153704.6:c.120T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6 BP7

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):​c.120T>C​(p.Ser40Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000088 in 1,614,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000084 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: TMEM67 NM_153704.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:4
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.403

Genes affected

TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BP6: Variant 8-93755034-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-93755034-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262741.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr8-93755034-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr8-93755034-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.403 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TMEM67	NM_153704.6	c.120T>C	p.Ser40Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 28	ENST00000453321.8	NP_714915.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMEM67	ENST00000453321.8	c.120T>C	p.Ser40Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 28	1	NM_153704.6	ENSP00000389998.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19 AN: 152206 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000393

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000795 AC: 20 AN: 251490 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000809 AC XY: 11 AN XY: 135920

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000114

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000841 AC: 123 AN: 1461890 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59 AN XY: 727246

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000827

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000265

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19 AN: 152206 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11 AN XY: 74370

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000393

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000478

Alfa AF: 0.000135 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000162

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 3 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 11 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome 6 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1

Dec 18, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	14
DANN	Benign	0.67

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.060		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs767999682; hg19: chr8-94767262;