rs768026366
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_005751.5(AKAP9):c.235C>T(p.Pro79Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000372 in 1,613,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005751.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000756 AC: 19AN: 251208Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135770
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000369 AC: 54AN: 1461674Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000536 AC XY: 39AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000809 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74172
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Long QT syndrome Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 79 of the AKAP9 protein (p.Pro79Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs768026366, gnomAD 0.07%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with AKAP9-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 190500). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at