rs7685117

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):​c.3222T>C​(p.Asp1074Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.999 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 806,221 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 1.0 ( 75754 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 ( 730467 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.29

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
PDGFRA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • congenital heart disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • isolated cleft palate
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 4-54295224-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54295224-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259953.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.29 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PDGFRANM_006206.6 linkc.3222T>C p.Asp1074Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 ENST00000257290.10 NP_006197.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDGFRAENST00000257290.10 linkc.3222T>C p.Asp1074Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 1 NM_006206.6 ENSP00000257290.5
ENSG00000282278ENST00000507166.5 linkc.2502T>C p.Asp834Asp synonymous_variant Exon 24 of 24 2 ENSP00000423325.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.997
AC:
151784
AN:
152182
Hom.:
75695
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.991
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.999
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.999
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.999
AC:
251088
AN:
251280
AF XY:
0.999
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.990
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
1.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
1.00
AC:
1461343
AN:
1461754
Hom.:
730467
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
726989
AN XY:
727184
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.991
AC:
33168
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
1.00
AC:
44702
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
1.00
AC:
26132
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
39693
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
86230
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
53420
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5767
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
1111870
AN:
1111886
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.999
AC:
60361
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
49
74
98
123
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21670
43340
65010
86680
108350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.997
AC:
151902
AN:
152300
Hom.:
75754
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.998
AC XY:
74296
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.991
AC:
41191
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.999
AC:
15287
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
1.00
AC:
3472
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5170
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
4814
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
10622
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
1.00
AC:
294
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
68031
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.999
AC:
2109
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
49
65
81
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
916
1832
2748
3664
4580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.998
Hom.:
32333
Bravo
AF:
0.997
Asia WGS
AF:
0.999
AC:
3474
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
1.00
EpiControl
AF:
1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jun 22, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Sep 13, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.030
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
-2.3
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7685117; hg19: chr4-55161391; COSMIC: COSV99955343; API