rs768594224
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.5169-6C>T variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000342 in 1,547,598 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000032 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MYO7A
NM_000260.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_000260.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002385
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.19
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
?
Variant 11-77203054-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77203054-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 288526.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=2}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.5169-6C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000409709.9 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.5169-6C>T | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000260.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000405 AC: 6AN: 148136Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000632 AC XY: 5AN XY: 79124
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
148136
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
79124
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000323 AC: 45AN: 1395296Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000262 AC XY: 18AN XY: 688278
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
45
AN:
1395296
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
688278
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 04, 2024 | - - |
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 23, 2016 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Uncertain:1
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1B Uncertain:1
| Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 17, 2020 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 23, 2017 | c.5169-6C>T in intron 37 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1/7730 South As ian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinst itute.org; dbSNP rs768594224). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at