rs769003601

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.3206G>T(p.Arg1069Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1069G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.50

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.14708868).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005732.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	RAD50	NM_005732.4	MANE Select	c.3206G>T	p.Arg1069Ile	missense	Exon 21 of 25	NP_005723.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.3206G>T	p.Arg1069Ile	missense	Exon 21 of 25	ENSP00000368100.4	Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000638452.2	TSL:5	c.2909G>T	p.Arg970Ile	missense	Exon 23 of 27	ENSP00000492349.2	A0A1W2PQ90
RAD50	ENST00000533482.5	TSL:1	n.*2832G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 21 of 25	ENSP00000431225.1	E9PM98

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152106

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

251086

AF XY:

0.0000221

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000479

AC:

AN:

1461372

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000413

AC XY:

AN XY:

726998

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26120

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39614

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86170

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53410

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5754

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111752

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152106

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74310

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41404

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.625

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder (3)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (2)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.22

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.19

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

Eigen

Benign

0.053

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.23

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

M_CAP

Benign

0.0042

MetaRNN

Benign

0.15

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.92

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.2

PhyloP100

3.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

REVEL

Benign

0.099

Sift4G

Benign

0.11

Polyphen

0.29

Vest4

0.65

MutPred

0.47

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0115)

MVP

0.71

ClinPred

0.37

GERP RS

5.4

PromoterAI

-0.0016

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.29

gMVP

0.42

Mutation Taster

=83/17

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over