rs770137926
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001244008.2(KIF1A):c.363+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000146 in 1,301,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001244008.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 9Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type 2CInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- hereditary spastic paraplegia 30Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disabilityInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- PEHO syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000139 AC: 2AN: 143892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000125 AC: 2AN: 159674 AF XY: 0.0000117 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000147 AC: 17AN: 1157562Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 11AN XY: 570024 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000139 AC: 2AN: 143892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 69650 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown. -
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type 2C;C5235139:Hereditary spastic paraplegia 30;C5393830:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 9 Uncertain:1
This sequence change falls in intron 3 of the KIF1A gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the KIF1A protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with KIF1A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 532902). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
History of neurodevelopmental disorder Uncertain:1
The c.363+4C>T intronic variant results from a C to T substitution 4 nucleotides after coding exon 3 in the KIF1A gene. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. Using the BDGP and ESEfinder splice site prediction tools, this alteration is not predicted to have any significant effect on this splice donor site; however, direct evidence is unavailable. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at