rs770213403

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001048166.1(STIL):c.892A>G(p.Asn298Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000049 in 1,613,484 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N298I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STIL
NM_001048166.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.01

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

STIL (HGNC:10879): (STIL centriolar assembly protein) This gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein implicated in regulation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint, a regulatory pathway that monitors chromosome segregation during cell division to ensure the proper distribution of chromosomes to daughter cells. The protein is phosphorylated in mitosis and in response to activation of the spindle checkpoint, and disappears when cells transition to G1 phase. It interacts with a mitotic regulator, and its expression is required to efficiently activate the spindle checkpoint. It is proposed to regulate Cdc2 kinase activity during spindle checkpoint arrest. Chromosomal deletions that fuse this gene and the adjacent locus commonly occur in T cell leukemias, and are thought to arise through illegitimate V-(D)-J recombination events. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

STIL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
holoprosencephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

STIL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05050811).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000506 (74/1461396) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00165 (74/44714). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00135. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 31 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STIL	NM_001048166.1 link	c.892A>G	p.Asn298Asp	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 17	ENST00000371877.8	NP_001041631.1	Q15468-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
STIL	ENST00000371877.8 link	c.892A>G	p.Asn298Asp	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 17	1	NM_001048166.1	ENSP00000360944.3		Q15468-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

152088

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000247

AC:

AN:

251080

AF XY:

0.000191

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000506

AC:

AN:

1461396

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000426

AC XY:

AN XY:

727018

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00165

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39658

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111660

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

152088

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74308

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41410

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10594

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000683

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000102

ExAC

AF:

0.000132

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:4

Sep 17, 2021

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 298 of the STIL protein (p.Asn298Asp). The asparagine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between asparagine and aspartic acid. This variant is present in population databases (rs770213403, ExAC 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with STIL-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 282750). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Dec 15, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 14, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 14, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

STIL-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

T;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.040

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.050

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.86

LIST_S2

Benign

0.83

T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.051

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.4

M;.;M;.;.

PhyloP100

2.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.49

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

N;.;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.092

Sift

Benign

0.15

T;.;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.50

T;T;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.69

P;.;P;P;B

Vest4

0.35

MutPred

0.66

Gain of sheet (P = 0.0016);.;Gain of sheet (P = 0.0016);Gain of sheet (P = 0.0016);.;

MVP

0.61

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.11

GERP RS

3.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.30

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over