rs77102810

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.2133C>T(p.Ser711Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00119 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 11 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00068 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.418

Variant links:

Genes affected

ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

ALK links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 2-29251176-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29251176-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 239800.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.418 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0061 (929/152288) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0215 (894/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0203. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 459 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 929 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ALK	NM_004304.5 link	c.2133C>T	p.Ser711Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 29	ENST00000389048.8	NP_004295.2	Q9UM73B6D4Y2
ALK	XR_001738688.3 link	n.3060C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 18

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ALK	ENST00000389048.8 link	c.2133C>T	p.Ser711Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 29	1	NM_004304.5	ENSP00000373700.3		Q9UM73
ALK	ENST00000618119.4 link	c.1002C>T	p.Ser334Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 28	5		ENSP00000482733.1		A0A087WZL3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00600

AC:

913

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0212

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00177

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00155

AC:

390

AN:

250876

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00133

AC XY:

180

AN XY:

135648

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0199

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000840

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000529

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000676

AC:

988

AN:

1461784

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000630

AC XY:

458

AN XY:

727184

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0225

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000895

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000951

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000324

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00119

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00610

AC:

929

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00616

AC XY:

459

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0215

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00236

Alfa

AF:

0.00296

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00639

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3

Benign:3

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 22, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jun 18, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

8.0

DANN

Benign

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over