rs771059047

Positions:

chr16-70264969-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001605.3(AARS1):c.1481G>T(p.Ser494Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000694 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000074 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AARS1
NM_001605.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.50

Variant links:

Genes affected

AARS1 (HGNC:20): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 1) The human alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) belongs to a family of tRNA synthases, of the class II enzymes. Class II tRNA synthases evolved early in evolution and are highly conserved. This is reflected by the fact that 498 of the 968-residue polypeptide human AARS shares 41% identity witht the E.coli protein. tRNA synthases are the enzymes that interpret the RNA code and attach specific aminoacids to the tRNAs that contain the cognate trinucleotide anticodons. They consist of a catalytic domain which interacts with the amino acid acceptor-T psi C helix of the tRNA, and a second domain which interacts with the rest of the tRNA structure. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

AARS1 links:

AARS1 (HGNC:):

AARS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.048503578).

BP6

Variant 16-70264969-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-70264969-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 246158.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000739 (108/1461892) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00237 (106/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.002. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 53 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AARS1	NM_001605.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1481G>T	p.Ser494Ile	missense_variant	11/21	ENST00000261772.13	NP_001596.2	P49588-1
AARS1	XM_047433666.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.1481G>T	p.Ser494Ile	missense_variant	11/16		XP_047289622.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AARS1	ENST00000261772.13 linkuse as main transcript	c.1481G>T	p.Ser494Ile	missense_variant	11/21	1	NM_001605.3	ENSP00000261772.8		P49588-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

251458

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000316

AC XY:

AN XY:

135918

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00252

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000739

AC:

108

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000729

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74304

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000272

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000212

ExAC

AF:

0.000280

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jan 05, 2024

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25817015) -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 24, 2024

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2N

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.38

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.62

Eigen

Benign

-0.30

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.17

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

M_CAP

Benign

0.056

MetaRNN

Benign

0.049

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.81

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.3

PrimateAI

Benign

0.42

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

REVEL

Benign

0.084

Sift

Benign

0.066

Sift4G

Benign

0.14

Polyphen

0.12

Vest4

0.57

MutPred

0.39

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0043);

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.46

ClinPred

0.074

GERP RS

5.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.15

gMVP

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over