rs771099683
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_021147.5(CCNO):c.787C>T(p.Arg263Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000294 in 1,596,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R263P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021147.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 29Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_021147.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCNO | NM_021147.5 | MANE Select | c.787C>T | p.Arg263Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_066970.3 | ||
| CCNO | NR_125346.2 | n.1248C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 | |||||
| CCNO | NR_125347.2 | n.877C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCNO | ENST00000282572.5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.787C>T | p.Arg263Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000282572.4 | ||
| CCNO | ENST00000501463.2 | TSL:1 | n.*767C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000422485.1 | |||
| CCNO | ENST00000501463.2 | TSL:1 | n.*767C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000422485.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000237 AC: 5AN: 211144 AF XY: 0.0000348 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000298 AC: 43AN: 1443948Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000349 AC XY: 25AN XY: 717136 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.787C>T (p.R263W) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 3) of the CCNO gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 787, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 263 to be replaced by a tryptophan (W). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 263 of the CCNO protein (p.Arg263Trp). The arginine residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between arginine and tryptophan. This variant is present in population databases (rs771099683, ExAC 0.03%) but has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a CCNO-related disease. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Polymorphism"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, this variant is a rare missense change with uncertain impact on protein function. There is no indication that it causes disease, but the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at