rs77137413

Positions:

chr11-17526373-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153676.4(USH1C):c.648G>A(p.Leu216Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000507 in 1,614,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

USH1C
NM_153676.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.260

Variant links:

Genes affected

USH1C (HGNC:12597): (USH1 protein network component harmonin) This gene encodes a scaffold protein that functions in the assembly of Usher protein complexes. The protein contains PDZ domains, a coiled-coil region with a bipartite nuclear localization signal and a PEST degradation sequence. Defects in this gene are the cause of Usher syndrome type 1C and non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal recessive type 18. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

USH1C links:

USH1C (HGNC:):

USH1C links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).

BP6

Variant 11-17526373-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17526373-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48023.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-17526373-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.26 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000617 (94/152290) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0143 (74/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0117. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 59 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
USH1C	NM_153676.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.648G>A	p.Leu216Leu	synonymous_variant	8/27	ENST00000005226.12	NP_710142.1	Q9Y6N9-5
USH1C	NM_005709.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.648G>A	p.Leu216Leu	synonymous_variant	8/21	ENST00000318024.9	NP_005700.2	Q9Y6N9-1A0A0S2Z4U9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
USH1C	ENST00000005226.12 linkuse as main transcript	c.648G>A	p.Leu216Leu	synonymous_variant	8/27	5	NM_153676.4	ENSP00000005226.7		Q9Y6N9-5
USH1C	ENST00000318024.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.648G>A	p.Leu216Leu	synonymous_variant	8/21	1	NM_005709.4	ENSP00000317018.4		Q9Y6N9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000618

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00135

AC:

338

AN:

251144

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

163

AN XY:

135772

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0169

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000490

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000496

AC:

725

AN:

1461730

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000480

AC XY:

349

AN XY:

727166

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000899

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00197

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000617

AC:

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000792

AC XY:

AN XY:

74468

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000784

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000126

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000869

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00924

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Jun 21, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Feb 10, 2017	p.Leu216Leu in exon 8 of USH1C: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.7% (147/8606) of East Asian chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs77137413). -

not provided

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Aug 21, 2019	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Usher syndrome type 1C

Benign:2

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Oct 21, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Benign

8.1

DANN

Benign

0.82

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over