Menu
GeneBe

rs77341011

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000020.3(ACVRL1):c.330G>A(p.Ser110=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00449 in 1,598,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 39 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 53 hom. )

Consequence

ACVRL1
NM_000020.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.297
Variant links:
Genes affected
ACVRL1 (HGNC:175): (activin A receptor like type 1) This gene encodes a type I cell-surface receptor for the TGF-beta superfamily of ligands. It shares with other type I receptors a high degree of similarity in serine-threonine kinase subdomains, a glycine- and serine-rich region (called the GS domain) preceding the kinase domain, and a short C-terminal tail. The encoded protein, sometimes termed ALK1, shares similar domain structures with other closely related ALK or activin receptor-like kinase proteins that form a subfamily of receptor serine/threonine kinases. Mutations in this gene are associated with hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2, also known as Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 12-51913575-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 212791.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0136 (2069/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0407 (1692/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0391. There are 39 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 970 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 2064 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ACVRL1NM_000020.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.330G>A p.Ser110= synonymous_variant 4/10 ENST00000388922.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ACVRL1ENST00000388922.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.330G>A p.Ser110= synonymous_variant 4/101 NM_000020.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0136
AC:
2064
AN:
152224
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0407
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00785
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00303
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00468
AC:
1099
AN:
234742
Hom.:
17
AF XY:
0.00383
AC XY:
493
AN XY:
128666
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0422
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000551
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000395
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00419
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00354
AC:
5113
AN:
1446132
Hom.:
53
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00325
AC XY:
2336
AN XY:
719834
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0399
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00383
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000766
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000442
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00287
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00482
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0136
AC:
2069
AN:
152342
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0130
AC XY:
970
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0407
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00784
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00303
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0156
Alfa
AF:
0.00828
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.0152
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00278
EpiControl
AF:
0.00232

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 2 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 17, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterAug 02, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabDec 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 10, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 08, 2021- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 26, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Benign
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.72
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.72
Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77341011; hg19: chr12-52307359; API