rs77341011

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000020.3(ACVRL1):c.330G>A(p.Ser110Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00449 in 1,598,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 39 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 53 hom. )

Consequence

ACVRL1
NM_000020.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.297

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACVRL1 (HGNC:175): (activin A receptor like type 1) This gene encodes a type I cell-surface receptor for the TGF-beta superfamily of ligands. It shares with other type I receptors a high degree of similarity in serine-threonine kinase subdomains, a glycine- and serine-rich region (called the GS domain) preceding the kinase domain, and a short C-terminal tail. The encoded protein, sometimes termed ALK1, shares similar domain structures with other closely related ALK or activin receptor-like kinase proteins that form a subfamily of receptor serine/threonine kinases. Mutations in this gene are associated with hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2, also known as Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACVRL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

PP3

Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.

BP6

Variant 12-51913575-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 212791.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0136 (2069/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0407 (1692/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0391. There are 39 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 970 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 2069 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACVRL1	NM_000020.3 link	c.330G>A	p.Ser110Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	ENST00000388922.9	NP_000011.2	P37023A0A0S2Z310

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ACVRL1	ENST00000388922.9 link	c.330G>A	p.Ser110Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	1	NM_000020.3	ENSP00000373574.4		P37023

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0136

AC:

2064

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0407

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00785

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00122

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00303

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0158

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00468

AC:

1099

AN:

234742

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00383

AC XY:

493

AN XY:

128666

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0422

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000101

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000551

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000395

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00175

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00263

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00419

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00354

AC:

5113

AN:

1446132

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00325

AC XY:

2336

AN XY:

719834

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0399

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00383

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000766

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000442

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00192

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00287

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00482

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0136

AC:

2069

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0130

AC XY:

970

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0407

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00784

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00122

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00303

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0156

Alfa

AF:

0.00828

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0152

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00278

EpiControl

AF:

0.00232

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 2

Benign:5

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 02, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Feb 26, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.72

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.72

Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over