rs77341011
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000020.3(ACVRL1):c.330G>A(p.Ser110=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00449 in 1,598,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 39 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 53 hom. )
Consequence
ACVRL1
NM_000020.3 synonymous
NM_000020.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.297
Genes affected
ACVRL1 (HGNC:175): (activin A receptor like type 1) This gene encodes a type I cell-surface receptor for the TGF-beta superfamily of ligands. It shares with other type I receptors a high degree of similarity in serine-threonine kinase subdomains, a glycine- and serine-rich region (called the GS domain) preceding the kinase domain, and a short C-terminal tail. The encoded protein, sometimes termed ALK1, shares similar domain structures with other closely related ALK or activin receptor-like kinase proteins that form a subfamily of receptor serine/threonine kinases. Mutations in this gene are associated with hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2, also known as Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
PP3
?
Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
?
Variant 12-51913575-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 212791.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-51913575-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0136 (2069/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0407 (1692/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0391. There are 39 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 970 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 2064 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVRL1 | NM_000020.3 | c.330G>A | p.Ser110= | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000388922.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVRL1 | ENST00000388922.9 | c.330G>A | p.Ser110= | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_000020.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0136 AC: 2064AN: 152224Hom.: 39 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2064
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00468 AC: 1099AN: 234742Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00383 AC XY: 493AN XY: 128666
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1099
AN:
234742
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
493
AN XY:
128666
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00354 AC: 5113AN: 1446132Hom.: 53 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00325 AC XY: 2336AN XY: 719834
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5113
AN:
1446132
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
2336
AN XY:
719834
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0136 AC: 2069AN: 152342Hom.: 39 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 970AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2069
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
970
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 2 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 17, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Aug 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 10, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 08, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 26, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
Position offset: 2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at