rs77414333
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.2859C>T(p.Val953Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000361 in 1,611,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00031 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous
NM_194248.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.22
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 2-26476135-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26476135-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48207.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.22 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | NM_194248.3 | c.2859C>T | p.Val953Val | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | ENST00000272371.7 | NP_919224.1 | |
OTOF | NM_194323.3 | c.618C>T | p.Val206Val | synonymous_variant | 6/29 | ENST00000339598.8 | NP_919304.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.2859C>T | p.Val953Val | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371.2 | ||
OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.618C>T | p.Val206Val | synonymous_variant | 6/29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
47
AN:
152158
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000187 AC: 46AN: 246216Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000194 AC XY: 26AN XY: 133982
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
246216
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
133982
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000367 AC: 535AN: 1459126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000373 AC XY: 271AN XY: 725826
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
535
AN:
1459126
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
271
AN XY:
725826
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
47
AN:
152276
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 21, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Sep 02, 2010 | Val953Val in exon 23 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice site. - |
OTOF-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 05, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at