rs77461664

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):​c.655-6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00127 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00089 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MEN1
NM_001370259.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003632
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.388
Variant links:
Genes affected
MEN1 (HGNC:7010): (menin 1) This gene encodes menin, a tumor suppressor associated with a syndrome known as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Menin is a scaffold protein that functions in histone modification and epigenetic gene regulation. It is thought to regulate several pathways and processes by altering chromatin structure through the modification of histones. [provided by RefSeq, May 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 11-64807686-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-64807686-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 96253.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=9, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-64807686-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00498 (758/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0169 (702/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0159. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 359 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 758 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MEN1NM_001370259.2 linkc.655-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 9 ENST00000450708.7 NP_001357188.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MEN1ENST00000450708.7 linkc.655-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 9 5 NM_001370259.2 ENSP00000394933.3 O00255-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00497
AC:
756
AN:
152188
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00142
AC:
355
AN:
250756
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00102
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
135584
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000608
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000889
AC:
1299
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000796
AC XY:
579
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000488
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00101
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00498
AC:
758
AN:
152306
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00482
AC XY:
359
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.000952
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00568
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23321498, 10849016) -

Jan 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

MEN1: BS1, BS2 -

Feb 16, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 02, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 Benign:4
Sep 20, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:2
Sep 04, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MEN1 c.655-6C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 250756 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 70 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MEN1 causing Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 phenotype (2.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.655-6C>T in individuals affected with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likey benign/benign, n=3; VUS, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Jun 10, 2021
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.655-6C>T variant in MEN1 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 1.79% (445/24892) of African chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Oct 15, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 30, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

MEN1-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 15, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hyperparathyroidism Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
5.0
DANN
Benign
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000036
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.25
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.25
Position offset: -25

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77461664; hg19: chr11-64575158; API