rs77469944
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):āc.18475A>Gā(p.Met6159Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0148 in 1,552,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,108 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.18475A>G | p.Met6159Val | missense_variant | 88/90 | ENST00000405460.9 | NP_115495.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.18475A>G | p.Met6159Val | missense_variant | 88/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | ENSP00000384582.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0421 AC: 6329AN: 150442Hom.: 364 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0265 AC: 4328AN: 163388Hom.: 222 AF XY: 0.0288 AC XY: 2478AN XY: 86066
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0119 AC: 16652AN: 1401586Hom.: 742 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0138 AC XY: 9526AN XY: 691652
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0422 AC: 6354AN: 150556Hom.: 366 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0418 AC XY: 3069AN XY: 73378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 27, 2012 | Met6159Val in exon 88 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 11% (347/3046) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs77469944). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 02, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 28, 2023 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at