rs77524207

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):​c.1019G>A​(p.Arg340Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00285 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 107 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 55 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 52 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.91
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002336204).
BP6
Variant 4-54267639-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54267639-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41790.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.051 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PDGFRANM_006206.6 linkc.1019G>A p.Arg340Gln missense_variant Exon 7 of 23 ENST00000257290.10 NP_006197.1 P16234-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDGFRAENST00000257290.10 linkc.1019G>A p.Arg340Gln missense_variant Exon 7 of 23 1 NM_006206.6 ENSP00000257290.5 P16234-1
ENSG00000282278ENST00000507166.5 linkc.1018-7286G>A intron_variant Intron 12 of 23 2 ENSP00000423325.1 A0A0B4J203
PDGFRAENST00000509092.5 linkn.837G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 6 of 15 1
PDGFRAENST00000509490.5 linkn.1019G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 7 of 18 1 ENSP00000424218.1 P16234-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0150
AC:
2285
AN:
152098
Hom.:
55
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0516
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00727
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0105
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00405
AC:
1017
AN:
250864
Hom.:
21
AF XY:
0.00307
AC XY:
416
AN XY:
135546
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0546
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00304
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
2315
AN:
1461802
Hom.:
52
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00133
AC XY:
970
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0531
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00306
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00379
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0151
AC:
2293
AN:
152216
Hom.:
55
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0149
AC XY:
1110
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0516
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0104
Alfa
AF:
0.00324
Hom.:
17
Bravo
AF:
0.0173
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0493
AC:
217
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00499
AC:
606
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jun 22, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

PDGFRA: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 15, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.054
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.64
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.85
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.076
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.91
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.049
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.36
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0023
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.4
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
1.7
N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
0.32
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.029
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.0041
T
GERP RS
0.65
Varity_R
0.052
gMVP
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77524207; hg19: chr4-55133806; COSMIC: COSV57264174; COSMIC: COSV57264174; API