rs775584262
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3304G>A(p.Val1102Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000206 in 1,459,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000409 AC: 1AN: 244498Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 133136
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000206 AC: 3AN: 1459164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 725780
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at