rs77558739

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_022552.5(DNMT3A):c.759C>T(p.Pro253Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00129 in 1,613,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0070 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

DNMT3A
NM_022552.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.84

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNMT3A (HGNC:2978): (DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha) CpG methylation is an epigenetic modification that is important for embryonic development, imprinting, and X-chromosome inactivation. Studies in mice have demonstrated that DNA methylation is required for mammalian development. This gene encodes a DNA methyltransferase that is thought to function in de novo methylation, rather than maintenance methylation. The protein localizes to the cytoplasm and nucleus and its expression is developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

DNMT3A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Tatton-Brown-Rahman overgrowth syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Heyn-Sproul-Jackson syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

DNMT3A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 2-25248133-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-25248133-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 434955.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.84 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00702 (1070/152320) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0246 (1024/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0234. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 508 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1070 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNMT3A	NM_022552.5 link	c.759C>T	p.Pro253Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 23	ENST00000321117.10	NP_072046.2	Q9Y6K1-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNMT3A	ENST00000321117.10 link	c.759C>T	p.Pro253Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 23	1	NM_022552.5	ENSP00000324375.5		Q9Y6K1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00700

AC:

1066

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0246

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00180

AC:

450

AN:

249342

AF XY:

0.00133

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000626

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000818

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000691

AC:

1010

AN:

1461390

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000587

AC XY:

427

AN XY:

726976

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0239

AC:

800

AN:

33464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

AN:

44684

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26114

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86224

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53350

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000714

AC:

AN:

5606

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000396

AC:

AN:

1111908

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

100

AN:

60346

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

119

178

238

297

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00702

AC:

1070

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00682

AC XY:

508

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0246

AC:

1024

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00196

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

158

210

263

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00359

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00776

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 24, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

DNMT3A-related disorder

Benign:1

May 26, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Oct 02, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Tatton-Brown-Rahman overgrowth syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 12, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

0.91

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

-4.8

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over