rs775965879

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1772G>A(p.Arg591Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,613,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.651

Variant links:

Genes affected

MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

MET links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1283794).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000109 (16/1461802) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000227 (9/39682). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000118. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 8 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MET	NM_000245.4 link	c.1772G>A	p.Arg591Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 21	ENST00000397752.8	NP_000236.2	P08581-1A0A024R759

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MET	ENST00000397752.8 link	c.1772G>A	p.Arg591Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 21	1	NM_000245.4	ENSP00000380860.3		P08581-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000401

AC:

AN:

249390

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000739

AC XY:

AN XY:

135290

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000557

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000109

AC:

AN:

1461802

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000110

AC XY:

AN XY:

727196

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000227

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000450

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000658

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74280

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 97

Uncertain:1

Oct 18, 2023

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Renal cell carcinoma

Uncertain:1

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 591 of the MET protein (p.Arg591Gln). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 579079). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MET protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 24, 2022

MGZ Medical Genetics Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

May 30, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.R591Q variant (also known as c.1772G>A), located in coding exon 5 of the MET gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1772. The arginine at codon 591 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.081

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.26

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.39

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.50

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.37

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.75

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.021

MetaRNN

Benign

0.13

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

L;L;L

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.18

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.052

Sift

Benign

0.59

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.62

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.043

B;B;.

Vest4

0.13

MutPred

0.67

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0182);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0182);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0182);

MVP

0.45

MPC

0.48

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

0.67

Varity_R

0.080

gMVP

0.55

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over